Guan Eng on HSR: ‘You can get something… for half the price.’

(The Star) – Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng (pic) has said the government’s decision this week to scrap the high-speed rail (HSR) project was not only due to the high price tag of building it, but also steep cost burden to maintain the 350km link in the longer term.

Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad on Monday (May 28) confirmed plans to abandon the HSR between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore as part of cost-cutting moves to slash federal government debt of over RM1 trillion that had piled up during the nine-year tenure of ousted premier Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

In an interview with the South China Morning Post, Lim said the new administration estimated the initial cost of the high-speed rail project was likely to be more than RM100bil.

But more vexing were the other costs down the road.

“The backloading is very high … availability payments, maintenance charges, and also asset replacement charges – these are all backloaded,” Lim said.

He added: “The cap-ex [capital expenditure] is expensive, that’s one thing. We feel it’s above cost.

“But the other aspect is maintenance charges, which we are responsible for.”

Najib claimed after the HSR cancellation that the project would have brought in some RM650 billion in gross national income until 2069, along with 442,000 jobs in the same period.

When the deal was inked in December 2016, Najib also said the rail link with Singapore would give both neighbours – who have had a fractious history – “a big stake in keeping the relationship stable and warm.”

Asked if the economic benefits outweighed the cost of the rail link, Lim replied: “Is it worth it? You can get something for cheaper, for half the price.”

“What we are seeing are projects that are double the market price,” Lim said.

He was referring to various Najib-era infrastructure projects that are under review by the Mahathir administration.

The rail link was to have been designed, built, financed, operated and maintained by a private company jointly appointed by the two countries by open tender in the third quarter of 2019.

Singapore had already acquired two country clubs to make way for the rail link.

While the rail company was to have been a private entity, Lim took issue with the “financial infrastructure of the project”.

He cited the need for the two governments to give guarantees for “availability” fees – where payments are made for service or performance regardless of demand – as well as maintenance costs.

Like Mahathir, Lim emphasised further steps to formalise the cancellation would happen only after negotiations with Singapore.

The city state has not commented since Mahathir’s statement on Wednesday confirming the cancellation, with Singapore’s Ministry of Transport saying it awaited formal notice.

Mahathir said he believed Malaysia was liable to pay RM500mil in compensation to Singapore for shelving the project.

Malaysian government sources told SCMP the new administration’s unilateral decision had caused consternation among their Singaporean counterparts and there would likely be protracted negotiations.

Lim would only say he hoped the southern neighbour would understand Malaysia’s need to balance its books, adding: “Singaporeans go by the contract, so we need to talk to them and discuss with them.”