Has PAS become a single-issue party? Yes, for now


20170219_PAS_RUU_355_RALLY_34

(MMO) – “It will survive, but only by falling back into extreme localism. It will survive through a dialectic of politicising religion and ‘religionising’ politics”. 

After the clergy class drove the so-called progressives out of PAS in the 2015 party election, the Islamist party’s new leadership has since revived calls for Shariah rule in Malaysia.

For almost three years, Malaysia’s oldest Opposition party had seemingly made its ambition for the implementation of hudud laws in Kelantan ― which some believe is the reason behind its move to table a private member’s Bill in Parliament aiming at elevating the Shariah Courts’ punitive powers ― as its sole preoccupation.

Such perception is strengthened by the leadership’s seemingly lackadaisical attitude towards other crucial issues like rising costs of living and corruption.

In Parliament, PAS MPs are almost absent in all key policy debates. Apart from religious issues, observers say the new creed of PAS leaders has yet to make a mark intellectually or economically.

Political observers say these factors have given the view that PAS is a party with no capacity to tackle complex issues some truth.

The reasons for it, however, may not be as clear-cut as the widely held views that its rigid fixation with Islamic rule is mainly due to the theocratic background of the party’s present leadership. It is more tactical than single-mindedness.

Datuk Mohamad Abu Bakar, a political analyst attached to Universiti Malaya and an expert in PAS affairs, said focusing its campaign on Shariah laws alone is helping PAS regain the trust of Malay supporters that voted against the party in the 2013 general elections, when the Islamist outfit was deemed to have abandoned its Islamic roots in a bid to woo non-Malay support.

But most importantly, capitalising on an issue that resonates deeply with a significant chunk of the rural Malay electorate gives the party greater leverage to force either ruling coalition Barisan Nasional (BN) or Opposition pact Pakatan Harapan to make concessions in exchange for support, especially when the tactic is seen to be gaining traction, he said.

“By playing solo, PAS is able to have greater leverage on both BN and Pakatan Harapan simultaneously. So for the time being, if, say, it is able to garner support from Umno members as well for the rally, that is going to be a victory for the party,” Mohamad told Malay Mail Online.

Win-win

“It is tactical. After all the election is still far away. If you are glued to some kind of strategy, it can backfire..but if they are glued to either BN or the Opposition, then PAS will [be] beholden to them to the extent that it is going to be on the receiving end,” he added.

Some observers have noted in the past that the demise of Pakatan Rakyat, the bloc comprised of PKR, DAP and PAS, has benefited the Islamists tremendously ― it helped rejuvenate the party as its alienated supporters returned to its fold.

A strong PAS had driven Umno, which is losing trust among the Malays due to unpopular government policies, to court the party. In a bold political move that defied Umno’s secular background, prime minister and party president Datuk Seri Najib Razak had openly said that his government is supportive of the PAS campaign to increase the punitive powers of the Shariah Courts through Parliament.

Umno minister Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom also spoke at a mass rally organised by PAS here last Saturday to express support for president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang’s Bill to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, also known as Act 355.

Analysts believe Umno is already profiting from the political manoeuvre ― its Islamic credential gets a boost in a country that has become increasingly conservative in religion.

PAS, on the other hand, knows that while being seen too close to Umno may irk some of its hardcore supporters, ultimately its strategy has succeeded in upholding Islam by forcing a concession by the government to elevate “the status” of the Shariah Courts.

 

Read more here



Comments
Loading...