Does Suing MRT Co Make Us Pinggir Za’aba, TTDI Residents Elite?
Some wondered why I used my father’s Tan Sri title in the press release – it is to clearly showcase that the suit is being brought by BN supporters against a BN project. It is not political – the plaintiffs are not politicians. They are aggrieved citizens that have a case. They need the government to listen.
Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah bin Sanusi
I’ll begin first by thanking my good friend and occassional mentor, Ahiruddin “Rocky” Attan, for highlighting Pinggir Za’aba’s suit against MRT Co. This suit is very much a private matter to the plaintiffs, my wife being one of them. I also thank those who have commented for and against the suit in Rocky’s blog and hope they continue their interest here, and in the interest of getting some good feedback, I will also relax my typical restrictions to commentaries.
For those who have misunderstood Rocky’s definition of Elite, please have a look at the images of the houses of most of the plaintiffs on Pinggir Za’aba that I have attached below. Pinggir Za’aba is a long road, just as TTDI is a large housing area. The part of TTDI directly effected by the MRT has neither bungalows nor semi-D’s and whilst we are not the poorest of citizens, we are not among the most affluent either. We are Elite though, in that we are nearly all tertiary educated, most are or were professionals, managers in corporations or civil servants.
Having heard the views of many, allow me to present my reason for supporting my wife’s decision to join the civil suit against MRT Co. Metaphorically and in brief, I can say that the reason for my support of the suit is from my reading of Clausewitz’s On War, where the great Prussian military philosopher describes War as simply the continuation of Politics or Policy by other means. Hence, this suit, is simply the continuation of Pinggir Za’aba’s engagement of MRT Co by more aggressive means.
To elaborate on the why, ever since residents of Pinggir Za’aba were informed our homes would be impacted by the MRT’s construction by notices put up on trees along our road by SPAD some 2+ years ago, we have been trying our best to engage various government agencies. Understanding that the MRT is a nation-building project of some importance, we have never asked for it to be scrapped, but rather preferred re-alignment or an underground route for it, and failing that, that were at least hoping to be given due compensation either for damages to or for having to abandon our homes.
The PR and engagement from SPAD and Prasarana was to me actually quite poor, though I would put more blame on SPAD for this – Prasarana seemed in these engagements as being victims of circumstance. SPAD’s position was often inconsistent, its approach to engagement shoddy (beginning with notices put up on trees remember!), but at least there were no empty promises. Where they could not deliver on our suggestions of hopes, we received non-commitals and silence, which sounds bad, and may even sound strange for those who went to the PR ‘roadshows’, but worse was to come.
Read more at: http://thoughtsintangents.blogspot.com/2013/02/does-suing-mrt-co-make-us-pinggir-zaaba.html
