Part 6: The MACC NFA the case against Khir Toyo (3)

The evidence is there. A crime has been committed. It is, however, a ‘technical’ crime. And the party that paid the money should have known it should not have paid the money. So the party paying is the guilty party and not the party receiving the benefit. A very crucial witness is not well so the MACC does not want to stress him further by talking to him. The case, therefore, has to be closed as NFA. And see the names of the MACC personnel on the documents below, people who have already made fools of themselves in other cases involving Teoh Beng Hock, Rosli Dahlan and Ramli Yusuff.


Raja Petra Kamarudin