By Sandra Rajoo
Many felt disappointed and let down by the decision taken by the Ministry of Education (MOE) to abolish PPSMI. No matter how lengthy the arguments presented by the MOE, they still fall short.
Saying that teachers have to use Bahasa Malaysia to cater to students who do not understand English does not present a true picture of what is happening in schools. The problem does not lie entirely with the students; difficulty arose because of teachers’ proficiency too. When PPSMI was introduced almost 7 years ago, no proper groundwork was laid to prepare for the transition. Teachers who had been teaching in BM all the while were forced to switch to English. Imagine the difficulty. The MOE implemented some programmes to help these teachers but unfortunately the momentum lasted only a couple of years. After that, as usual, everything died a natural death. By right, Heads of schools should have been tasked with ensuring that teachers conscientiously and continuously upgrade their proficiency, at the same time providing the necessary support. Lack of seriousness and commitment has led to the demise of good policies.
The MOE says the policy is ‘flawed’ but provides no lucid analysis to support this assertion. Surely such a pronouncement requires more substantial and clear arguments. Merely quoting two researches done by two university educationists in my view, is quite inadequate. Who the respondents were, which schools were involved, what the actual findings are etc., are not clearly outlined or explained. We would certainly like to read the actual findings in order to draw our own conclusions. Merely making general statements to justify a reversal of policy seems like a tactic to lull the unsuspecting public to go along with its ideas without question. The Ministry has a research arm, EPRD, but correct me if I am wrong, they did not conduct any study on this very important matter. Why so?
Notwithstanding all the arguments about English being the language of Science and Technology, doing away with PPSMI at this point when there is nothing to take its place where English is concerned, is short-sighted and unwise. The MOE keeps talking about its Strengthening English Language Usage (MBI) policy but so far nothing of value has come of it. The first Year 1 English textbook for 2011 produced for such a purpose was found to be riddled with so many language errors it had to be recalled in the middle of this year. Apart from the millions of Ringgit gone to waste, in those six months one can only assume our children had picked up some really bad English! So, how does this fit into the MBI aspiration? Considering that the Ministry has direct control over the publication of school textbooks, it begs the question as to why a Year 1 book can turn out to be such a mess. Can the MOE ever get the textbook problem sorted out? It remains to be seen.
The public is also appalled by the recent PMR English paper which was riddled with language mistakes as well. The Examinations Syndicate should be taken to task for this fiasco. Why is the Ministry not serious about its own MBI policy? How does it expect schools and teachers to respond if it cannot climb out of its own abyss of apathy and inertia?
Also, the hiring of a few hundred British and American teachers to ‘help’ us sounds grand but it is really an ad hoc measure. Is there a framework against which the outcome of this exercise can be gauged? Who is assessing the situation on the ground? Can we justify the amount of money spent? All these questions beg answers. One cannot turn decades of negligence into success overnight with the hiring of a few native speakers.
The MOE keeps insisting that parents should be more supportive. Contrary to what it believes, parents are all for making our education system a success. Many parents have argued for PPSMI to continue. At least give schools the option to choose. Good sense tells us that all parents will support good and sound education policies that come with proper implementation procedures. If such policies go against good practices, parents will be doing a disservice and injustice to their children and the nation if they do not voice their displeasure.

written by syd, October 19, 2011 07:56:02
If you study science and maths in malay, every god dammn word is from english, translated in a honkey dorey way, into malay using malay spelling.
Circuit becomes sirkit.
squash becomes skuasy.
Compound becomes kompaun.
summon becomes saman.
can you see how confusing it is?
written by 1Beruk, October 19, 2011 02:18:39
Post-war communist countries used tight border control to imprison their citizens; criminal Umno pays foreign brain to imprison local brains.
The millions spent on APCO must be the most worthy investment ever made by Umno.
written by Sky, October 18, 2011 23:23:20
I have a growing hatred to the MOE for destroying our country and making this country full of idiots literally. I am deeply sadden to say that I face frustration communicating with idiots who cannot even understand simple English in my daily work. Go to the Government departments you can really see so many idiots behind the counters. Many cannot even speak properly in English. Some think they are farking smart unknowingly that they are not even able to secure a job in the private sector.
How can we be a developed nation when we have a nation of idiots who cannot communicate to others in the world.
MOE you are screwing up the future of our children and the future of Malaysia big time. May those supporting this damage to our kids future rot in hell.
written by Rocket, October 18, 2011 22:20:43
written by SpicaTwo, October 18, 2011 21:54:04
written by sky, October 18, 2011 19:00:46
Why ? Why ? Why ?
written by PTA, October 18, 2011 18:37:13
I dont want to learn Esperanto but the only language we should all learn is "Change" which translates as to burn Moohee at the stake.
written by Mypeople, October 18, 2011 18:29:43
written by ABU LAHAP, October 18, 2011 17:50:51
written by Wirawan, October 18, 2011 17:38:30
by the student named Victor above. You will see the classic example.
written by In a Nutshell, October 18, 2011 17:26:29
written by klchan, October 18, 2011 17:23:39
written by The Truth, October 18, 2011 17:01:31
written by abdullah37, October 18, 2011 16:51:35
written by TBH, October 18, 2011 16:46:20
Already they are feeling the heat. Earlier instruction to teach S&M in BM from next year has been replaced with "up to school, Guru Besar to decide, together with PIBG".
Parents and students who want PPSMI must ACT NOW!. Support. Visit http://www.malaysia-today.net/...-an-option
written by Victor, October 18, 2011 16:26:33
written by educationist, October 18, 2011 16:16:41
Amidst all the confusing signals the only clear sign is that PPSMI is dead; it is a goner for the very simple political reason that PAS & PKR are also on record opposing its continuation!!
The elite UMNOputras will have no problems as will those with the financial resources: their children will enjoy a private education or overseas education!!
Pity the next generation of young Malaysians currently in the school system especially those going to Form 1 & Form 4 next year;overnight they have to grapple with those 2 subjects in BM!!
Yes, Malaysia Boleh!!
























.jpg)


You can complain until the cow comes home... they just don't care because it doesn't affect them.
Their kids overseas getting ENGLISH education.
I say, vote them out - ABU x 2^4096