
It is time the opposition looked outside the party. Party loyalists can revert to party un-loyalists if the price is right. So who cares about party loyalty when it comes with a price and loyalty can be bought and sold? I would look at those who have proven themselves as champions of the people rather than champions of the party -- the party that pays them the most money.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
The policy was to contest every single seat, parliament as well as state. Barisan Nasional must never be allowed to win a single seat uncontested. No menang tanpa tanding (walk over) for Barisan Nasional. They would be given a fight even in constituencies where Barisan Nasional can easily win without any effort.
For example, in Gua Musang, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah would be able to win whether he contested as an Umno candidate, on an opposition ticket, or even as an independent. There was no way the opposition can dislodge Ku Li from his ‘kingdom’. Whomsoever contests in Gua Musang against Ku Li would be committing hara-kiri. It is a suicide mission and ‘sure death’.
Nevertheless, an opposition candidate would be fielded against Ku Li -- even though it was a futile exercise and ‘the Prince of Kelantan politics’ can retain his seat with both eyes closed and two hands tied behind his back. Someone would be ‘sent to his death’ in Gua Musang. He will be the sacrificial lamb, the kambing hitam to be slaughtered by Ku Li. Ku Li would definitely win and the opposition candidate would definitely be defeated, maybe even lose his deposit as well if the loss is that great. But a candidate will still be fielded against Ku Li, not with the possibility that he could win but just for the heck of it.
This strategy almost worked if not for the fact that some opposition candidates went MIA (missing in action). Something happened on the way to the office, the stand-up comedian would normally say. In this case, something happened on the way to the nomination centre. Some opposition candidates were paid off to disappear and to not turn up at the nomination centre. A few Barisan Nasional candidates did win uncontested after all when the opposition could not find their missing candidates.
When the nominations closed, Barisan Nasional got in with a few seats uncontested. However, except for these few, the majority of the seats were going to be contested. Barisan Nasional would win many more come polling day. A handful of the opposition candidates would win, of course, but a mere handful. Maybe Kelantan would remain opposition. The other states would remain Barisan Nasional. And Barisan Nasional would come in with a two-thirds majority in Parliament with, at best, 30 or 40 seats going to the opposition.
There are those who questioned the logic of contesting every single seat, knowing that the opposition could never win every single seat. Why not pick and choose only the ‘winnable’ seats to contest? Why contest those seats that you know you can’t win? After all, the opposition does not have enough candidates, or money needed to finance the many candidates. So why not just contest the seats the opposition can be assured of winning? Why also contest the seats you know you are going to lose, or spend all that money you do not have?
That was the other school of thought. And this was what people like Dr Chandra Muzaffar too believed, at the time when he was still an opposition leader of course. Select the winnable seats and contest only those seats. Forget about the seats that Barisan Nasional will never lose. It costs money to contest the general election. So why waste money you don’t have? And why field candidates in sure-lose seats when, in the first place, do you do not have enough candidates?
But no, the ego of the opposition would never allow Barisan Nasional to win any seat without a contest. Even if we lose we must still fight. We fight not only when we can be assured of winning. That is a coward’s strategy. We fight even if we know we are going to lose. That is what a ‘real man’ must do.
So it does not matter who the candidates are. After all, they are not going to win anyway. Send anyone. It does not matter who that person is. No need to choose our best man. We are going to lose that seat anyway. So why send our best man? We just want someone who is prepared to ‘die’, as he surely will. So why send our best man to die? Send someone not that good. We are sending him not to win but to be sacrificed.
That was the strategy. It was not a strategy to win. It was a strategy to make up the numbers. It was a strategy to send our best candidates to constituencies which we can win and the not so good to constituencies we can never win in a million years.
It was a good strategy. It was a good strategy if we are assured of winning a few seats and assured of losing many seats. The good candidates would be saved for the sure-win constituencies. And the not so good candidates would be sacrificed in the sure-lose constituencies.
It is not that easy to get good candidates anyway. Who would want to contest the general election on an opposition ticket? Who wants to make a fool of himself or herself by contesting the general election just to lose? Why contest when you are guaranteed of losing?
So the opposition lacked the ability to attract good candidates. And this was quite understandable. Those with any brains would never back a loser. Only brainless losers back losers. And the opposition is far from being the winner. The 2004 general election proved this. In 2004, many opposition candidates not only lost the election but lost their deposits as well. That was how disastrous it was in 2004. And why should 2008 be any different?
But the unexpected happened. What no one thought would happen did happen. The opposition won the seats they never expected to win. And lo and behold, they had fielded their ‘Grade B’ candidates in these seats. Some were not even ‘Grade B’ but ‘Grade C’. These are seats they thought they were never going to win in a million years. But these are seats they did win in 2008.
The opposition was caught with its pants down. It won many seats in 2008. And many of these seats were seats it did not think it could win but did win. And the candidates in these seats were not their best candidates. They were candidates who were supposed to lose. They were candidates sent out to ‘die’. They were candidates selected as sacrificial lambs, to be eaten by the Barisan Nasional lions.
But the lions did not eat the sacrificial lambs. Instead, the sacrificial lambs ate the lions. And the opposition ended up with many seats it never figured it would end up with. And the people now holding those seats are people the opposition would rather do without.
It was a good strategy. Field the best candidates in the winnable seats. Simply field anyone in the non-winnable seats. Pick whomsoever happened to be around that day and slot them in the seats you know you are going to be massacred. Just give an appearance of challenging Barisan Nasional in every constituency. It is only an appearance. You are not really giving Barisan Nasional a fight since you did not field your best candidates in those seats.
Yes, it was a good strategy. But it was a strategy that went wrong. You ended up with more seats than you thought you would end up with. And you ended up with more state assemblypersons and parliamentarians than you thought you would end up with. But not all are people whom you would have liked to have as state assemblypersons and parliamentarians. They were supposed to have lost the elections, the sacrificial lambs to be slaughtered by Barisan Nasional.
And now that strategy gone wrong has come home to roost. The opposition is seeing these candidates leave for greener pastures. They were not supposed to have won in the first place. They were supposed to have lost. But they did win. And now that they have won they want to leave the opposition to join Barisan Nasional where the pickings are better.
This is both good and bad. It is good in the sense that the opposition has now learned not to take things lightly. Don’t contest half-heartedly what you thought were non-winnable seats by fielding the worst candidates in those constituencies. You never know. You might end up winning those seats instead.
It is bad in that Barisan Nasional has also learned its lesson. If they can get enough opposition parliamentarians to cross over to Barisan Nasional then they will regain their two-thirds majority in parliament where they can redraw the election boundaries so that 2008 can never be repeated.
The opposition can, again, win 50% of the votes in the next general election. But the opposition’s share of 50% of the votes would translate to less than one-third of the seats in parliament while Barisan Nasional’s 50% will give them two-thirds. This is what they can do if they can get enough opposition parliamentarians to cross over before the next election.
Fine, looking at what happened in 2004, no one can blame the opposition for thinking that 2008 would be no better. However, against all odds, it was better. And this is why we are seeing the current exodus of crossovers. It is because of a good strategy that backfired, which means it was not that good a strategy after all.
Who do we blame for this? On hindsight, the opposition is to be blamed. But it is always easy to be an expert on hindsight. What about on foresight? If we feel that the opposition made a mistake in fielding bad candidates, whose fault is it? The opposition was begging for potential candidates to come forward and offer themselves as candidates. But not many were prepared to offer themselves as candidates. So the opposition was forced to select those not worthy of being candidates to field in the election.
Next time around, those of calibre must come forward to offer themselves as candidates. And the opposition must, on its part, be prepared to select people from outside the party. Never mind if they are not party people. Never mind if they are from the NGOs, civil society movements, activists, academicians, writers, Bloggers, or whatnot. Select them as candidates even if they have no party track record but are qualified and capable. This is what must happen the next time around, if there is a next time.
Head hunt for candidates for the next general election. And do it now rather than later. Identify good potential candidates and start talking to them now. And if the government suddenly holds a snap election you will not be caught off-guard. You will have your list of potential candidates ready. Then you won’t scramble to fill in the slots and be forced to field half-past-six people as candidates like last time.
I have my own list of some possible candidates. There are of course many more. These are not party people. In fact, some may have even been critical of the opposition, and even more critical of Barisan Nasional. These are people with qualifications and calibre. These are people with integrity and commitment. These are people who could become rich if they went into Barisan Nasional but choose not to even if they remain poor. These are people who not only know how to serve the country but also can never be made to change sides even if millions were at stake.
It is time the opposition looked outside the party. Party loyalists can revert to party un-loyalists if the price is right. So who cares about party loyalty when it comes with a price and loyalty can be bought and sold? I would look at those who have proven themselves as champions of the people rather than champions of the party -- the party that pays them the most money.
Is the opposition ready to break away from tradition? Is the opposition ready to abolish cronyism, the very thing they accuse Barisan Nasional of but which exists in the opposition as well? Has what is going on of late taught the opposition the lesson it dire needs?
I hope to see at least, say, 20 candidates for parliament and, say, 50 candidates for the state seats come from the ranks of the NGOs, civil society movements, activists, academicians, writers, Bloggers, or whatnot. That is only 10% or so of the total number of seats. Is 10% too much to ask? Is it not better to ‘lose’ 10% of the seats to these types of ‘non-party people’ rather than lose ‘party candidates’ to Barisan Nasional due to crossovers?
The ball is now at the feet of the opposition. I just hope they know which direction the goalpost is. I can forgive the opposition for its disaster in choosing candidates in the 2008 general election because I know why that happened. But there is no excuse or forgiving if it happens again after we now know what must be done. If they do this again even I might leave the opposition in disgust and go into retirement.
Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_02.html

written by DPG, March 04, 2010 00:16:34
written by Prince Yuva, March 03, 2010 09:21:11
He he he he
Who can forget how Semi Value was defeated...
Not a batalion of army that defeated him but the power of people....
Lets prove 2008 is not the best we can do....
Next election we will performing even BETTER


written by freerpk, March 03, 2010 08:18:46



written by Aduh, March 02, 2010 23:53:08
I like his headgear. It suits well on him. He is the funniest clown I have ever seen. !!! If I am a circus operator I will certainly engage him.
written by Sabahfan, March 02, 2010 20:57:38
WE HAVE how many million population in MALAYSIAL? common on, dont tell me just one percent is NOT qualified and the next YB including his willingness to drop whatever he is doing now and go into politics. There will always be a LONG queue if we open up the YB candidate post for application. So the important step should be all those party members queueing up to be candidates MUST be willing to be scrutinised just like a future President of the United States is put to scrutiny. Meaning HIS total background checked. No mistress, no ugly loans no drinking habits no gambling habits
Education what sorts of ideology he was subjected to in the past, such as IF Uitm graduates, either screen him/her for the rascist indoctrination OR maybe if possible first offload from his brain all the rascist indoctrination from Uitm etc.
Check family background, even check wifes background becos they are all influences in life. Candidates should even be disqualified if they have a fat greedy mama tagging along.
After all these are done, the candidate must be fit with some kind of homing devices so that he knows his where abouts is tracked for the next 5 years after winning It is not just about mistrusting him as YB but also as a form of protection in case he is kidnapped bu UMNO regime. and lastly all chosen candidate should be informed that if he is the first to jump, the penalty is ASSISNATION.
written by Democrats, March 02, 2010 19:48:21
I support them 100%.....
written by lynn, March 02, 2010 19:09:35
written by lynn, March 02, 2010 19:05:15
written by lynn, March 02, 2010 19:02:56
As suggested earlier, sorry to repeat, but all candidates standing under PR ticket must sign a Statutory Declaration on their own free will and accord that they will not leave PR thru' inducements via cash or via threats. If anyone wants to leave PR for any reason after he/she won in GE13 under PR's banner, he or she must automatically step down & call for by-election.
written by lynn, March 02, 2010 18:59:49
written by panca, March 02, 2010 18:58:22
So this a man who would not be defeated. Nope, I am not promoting violence but you just could not break such a guy's fighting spirit. With salute I would for him.
This is in line with the favorite saying I pick up that is "It is not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog that matters". I mean a real dog fight (not mca or mic fight), has anyone seen a real dog, ferocious dog fight in the street(fighter)? See them roll and roll with their fangs but not to much stray dogs these days because some vietnamese already helped clean up perhaps.
No walk over remember! The wind of change is here when you prepare to fight with real good people as candidates for your next victory, the like when you simply fielded ayam itik and won in the last election and turned out to be frogs. Pakatan Pact get the drift.....
I have one indeed, a well like and respected banker, I hope he offer himself when opportunity knocks!
written by lynn, March 02, 2010 18:57:40
written by minime, March 02, 2010 18:25:21
this way, u have both the malay and indians votes..since Paya Besar is under Kulim, u bet to
have the indians' support
i'm not a member of any political part...but i bet u my honour cannot be bought by any!
written by capricorn, March 02, 2010 17:02:37
written by Sunshine1, March 02, 2010 16:48:35
written by LC Teh, March 02, 2010 15:14:59
So far UMNO has confidently or rather, arrogantly and blatantly ignored all pleas to clean up their house and take action on those found guilty of corruption. Instead they have even become openly racist in spite of the 1Malaysia slogan shouting which makes them sound so hollow. Don't you think UMNO will aim to make use of the precedent to get the King to appoint their own PM even if the opposition wins the next elections?
written by gindow, March 02, 2010 12:37:31
PLEASE heed what RPK has suggested,or else its goodbye to PR in the next GE13!!!
Get the ball rolling now before its too late.
I do hope that we will never see Frogs & Toads jumping ship after being elected,
a real menace to the society!!!!
written by Sashi Nair, March 02, 2010 10:28:22
written by Aria, March 02, 2010 10:15:35
There are hundreds of thousands of candidates to choose from. If Pakatan puts up an advertisement in the newspaper for candidates, there will be thousands of people responding. The people that respond should be qualified, such as having a Masters, PHD, Doc etc. and have experience in leadership and cares for the country more then about self-riches. There is no excuse for not having the best candidate. This is just like our national hockey or football team, the best people are not chosen because of race, religion and knowing the right person. Every candidate of Pakatan this time must be the very best and anyone currently who does not meet this requirement must step down. The rakyat are not interested if the candidates were not previously a party loyalist, but rather that they are clever people who will do good for Malaysia.
The Paktan party is only a symbol for candidates who are going to serve Malaysia. The Pakatan party better break its tradition or it is just going to be another UMNO. As RPK said “Don’t wait till the next elections before looking for candidates”. This will also show the rakyat that Pakatan has learnt its lesson and is going to be an even better party come next elections.
written by Old Man, March 02, 2010 06:58:51
Candidates should not think that they fighting for the future of their children or grandchildren BUT for the RAKYAT.
What's is the use of accumulating so much wealth when their great grandchildren will not even know the names their great grandfathers!
Candidates should not be intimidated by those racist NGOs, MCC or whatever shit. If you want peace and dignity for our Country, you've to be prepared for war against those parasites of our Country! After all, everybody has to die sooner or later. Sir RPK, we shall march with you! Thank you...
written by Better My, March 02, 2010 05:38:46
Agree. These people have full of passion. Give them a crush course on opposition system. then you have a potentially great group of candidates. Ought to be tried out more.
written by educationist, March 02, 2010 04:26:33
But the problem may be that there are many qualified candidates like u in 2008 who may not want to contest on a opposition ticket.
Well,we cannot complain then, can we/
We get the government we deserve.!!
written by Semuaok, March 02, 2010 02:18:08
written by Aduh, March 02, 2010 01:15:35
No matter how badly a party needs to field a non-party candidate, the person MUST NOT BE ibrahim ali . Look what the frog has done to PAS who was kind enough to allow him to contest under PAS ticket.
written by rocky, March 02, 2010 01:13:31
written by Motherchell, March 02, 2010 01:11:19
This headgear was personally chosen for the new 76 Battalions of the UMNO Malay warriors by Najib himself to threaten the "instability" of the Country and the World --- to frighten the "enemy" to switch sides and to make it more earthquake proof---they tested the headgear in Washington recently --and found that it hit OBAMA's stomach muscles . These Warriors including the "Anti Communist" from Penang have sneaked back to their motherland SAS commando style. They are on R&R now.
cheers !
written by storm62, March 02, 2010 00:27:58
that's a nice piece of picture...hi hi hi.
is that the new "head gear" of the "ketuanan melayu umno" warriors ???
written by flyer168, March 01, 2010 23:19:51
You have finally said it for PKR & PR (Enough is enough...after giving them the Barisan Rayaat support & the benefit of doubt) & this is their last chance for what its worth....
To support your 2nd last paragraph, Party Loyalist can contribute just so much.....but "Fresh Talents" are required to move the party forward with "New & not Recycled" Strategies/Programmes.
Could it all be a case of "The 080308 Dream" with so many candidates "Roped in as Accidental Politicians" & who are now falling by the wayside one by one...
Two years have passed, when we could have helped them with the formation of the 3rd Front and/or helped them to get a good number of "Honourable Established & Dedicated Professionals/ Technocrats" within that "Timeframe" to fill up their 2nd Line Echelon Pool & to move the party forward...whilst they were busy fighting the "fires around them"....
As a matter of fact, I had suggested the above to YB Nurul Izzah & YB Khalid Samad at one gathering sometime last year, but they were too busy fighting the fires I suppose....
"All the PR Leaders needed to do, was to call for an AGM/EGM to get the "Mandate" to recruit & accept these group as Party "Associate members" for a period of 1 year, 3 years or 5 years before being absorbed as full members based on their performance.
Well, it might be a little late now....with so many branch Leaders/members disillusioned & "Jumping Ship"...
To quote you: "But there is no excuse or forgiving if it happens again after we now know what must be done. If they do this again even I might leave the opposition in disgust and go into retirement." Unquote.
Yes, I will join you in retirement too, Pet.
Cheers & take care.
written by cheekhiaw, March 01, 2010 23:14:14
xxx
written by Motherchell, March 01, 2010 23:09:52
1) Constituency and Country,
2) Culture,
3)expect Rm15K/month,
4)expect us, the tax payers to pay for his luxury cars, (Porche,Benzes,etc)
5)moonlight with his own business
6)Have tens of mistresses, a kaki botol and gambler and run away on taxpayers foreign trips with some UMNOPUTRAS,
Etc, Etc. Let that candidate not bring shame to the Party and to the people of Malaysia by making the whole World laugh at us as this minion you see here!
written by Bullchick, March 01, 2010 23:00:37
written by hellosunshine, March 01, 2010 22:59:01
written by Bullchick, March 01, 2010 22:37:14
written by sahabat, March 01, 2010 22:28:35
Loyalty to the party and understanding the true struggle of the party are the most required elements to be a candiadte and not based on who you know in the party leadership.
written by fireduck, March 01, 2010 22:21:56
DAP has an image problem, unfairly smeared upon it as a Chinese chauvinist party. PAS has an equally big problem as many people are put off by the mix of religion & politics. PKR was supposed to be middle-of-the-road party and because of that was able to harness a lot of energy from very many dedicated and positive people. Alas, it is also the party that, in its earnest drive to political centrestage, it forgo the need for careful vetting of candidates and membership. Now it is the component party that seems to be breaking apart or riddled with holes in the face of the onslaught by UMNO's divide-and-rule tactics.
In the event Anwar is taken down by Najib in the Sodomy2 case, and PKR is left too riddled with holes left by the frogs, may I suggest a Plan B be readied. There are many quality and sincere reps and members in PKR who believe in, and work courageously for those changes for the better but are unfortunately caught in this cesspool of dirty politics played by UMNO against the Pakatan. We should not let them lose their hopes and aspirations, and should allow them the opportunity to see their efforts come into fruition.
If they are dragged down by PKR the party, Plan B should be initiated, and a new party, led by Zaid Ibrahim (or even Tengku Razaleigh) should immediately be formed, to allow these people to join and continue the struggle. Understandably, many may not be able to contribute via the other two parties, DAP & PAS, for one reason or another, so a new party that champions the People's Declaration, etc, should be set up.
And hopefully, this time around, the membership criteria is more stringent.
















