|
I do understand that the RM 625 is a rebate given by the government, but it also means that one has to use the Vios for 42.08 years just to make back the amount paid in taxes for the usage of a foreign car. Would anyone use any kind of car for that long? By Aneed Anand
They say curiosity kills the cat. I so hope this particular phrase is not true today because, for the love of God, I am very curios. The front page of The Star today shows a picture of our PM and a caption saying, “We try our best to help the people. We cannot satisfy everyone”. Below that there is a portion showing the changes. The most interesting change is the rebate of RM625 a year for private vehicles with the capacity of below 2000cc. Just to let you guys know, I was educated in Malaysia, in fact in Sabah and am not too proud of my achievements as a student but the education provided to me has not failed to provide me with basic counting and thinking abilities. Let’s look at a simple example of how ridiculous this price hike is. We all know that foreign cars are taxed to protect Proton’s interest in the market and the taxes are pretty expensive. The issue is, we can’t seem to put sniff out the exact amount taxed because the taxation system is sophisticated that it actually takes into consideration the make of the vehicle, capacity, and many other factors. Instead of confusing ourselves even more lets just take a simple car, which can’t be taxed much due to our trade agreements with Japan , and compare how this fuel price hike actually turns out. As of last month a Toyota Vios would ‘cause a damage’ of about RM 89,000 In the international market, a Toyota Vios is about USD 19,000 USD 19,000 = RM 62,700 (using the indicative rates of USD 1 = RM 3.30) That makes Malaysian Vios owners pay an extra RM 26,300. This RM 26,300 should be cost of operations, profit and tax because the transportation costs have been factored in to the USD 19,000. RM 26,300/ RM625 per year translates to a Vios being used for 42.08 years. I do understand that the RM 625 is a rebate given by the government, but it also means that one has to use the Vios for 42.08 years just to make back the amount paid in taxes for the usage of a foreign car. Would anyone use any kind of car for that long? Now with these numbers in front of us, does the subsidy sound like a subsidy or does it sound like a penalty? This just seems to be a heavy increment in our daily cost of living as we are not only charged with high car taxes but also with a drastic increase in fuel price. With all the numbers listed out, I urge all Malaysians to join me in analyzing the situation. Car taxation is government profit, fuel sales is Petronas’ (GLC - Government Linked Copmany) profit which translates into government profit. The government may ridicule us Malaysians by saying look at the world market and fuel price world wide. Please, we are Malaysians, we fought of the British, had a international port in the early centuries (Malacca), home to a racially mixed nation and WE ARE NOT STUPID!!! We know the international rates are above the USD 130/barrel. We understand the fact that the fuel prices are increasing worldwide and we also know that major scientist are still contradicting on why this phenomenon is happening. Some blame Bush and his plunders around the world and some blame climate change and there are others which say petroleum ‘wells’ are getting scarce. Again we go back to numbers. One barrel or crude oil is 159 liters. And approximately 46-47% of a barrel of crude oil will turn out to be the fuel that we use in our vehicles. 46% of 159 = 73.14liters. And at the current rate of RM 2.70/liter, this constitutes to RM197.48 of fuel per barrel of crude oil. This is only 46% of the barrel, mind you. There is another 54% that are still refined and traded in the markets. These products include bitumen, kerosene, and natural gases and so many more. Using the indicative value of RM 3.30 = USD 1(it is actually RM3.26 today), we get that a barrel of crude oil produces USD 59.84 worth of fuel. And this makes a balance of USD 70.16 that has not been accounted for. In actual fact, we still pay for this as they are charged in the forms of fuel surcharge by airlines and road taxes for the building of road (because they use the tar/bitumen) and many more excuse charging us but let us just leave all that out of our calculations. USD 59.84 compared to a barrel of crude oil which is approximately USD 130 turns out to be 46% of a barrel as well. So this is where I got curios. Where is the subsidy if we are paying 46% of the price of a barrel of crude oil when the production of petrol/barrel of crude oil is still only 46%? Now the government has a very ugly predicament in front of them. The taxation of foreign cars to protect Proton has been deemed unfair by this calculations and the price of fuel is currently at world market price. So I hope our PM retracts his statement in The Star today as it seems like a joke after all these calculations. Who is helped by this move? Not the poor, not even the rich. Everyone is affected. Cost of living rises and everyone will feel the pinch. As far as I know, only the politicians who live in Putrajaya and come for their Parliament meetings in Kuala Lumpur (approximately 60+ km) are the ones to gain as they claim their fuel and toll charges from the money of the RAKYAT. It is so disappointing to see this happen time and time again to the Malaysian public, where they are deceived by the propaganda held by the politicians and the controls they have over the press. NOTE - Most of the values in this article are true and can be found on the internet dated 05/06/2008 (except the price of a barrel of crude oil where it depends on day to day trading).
 |
Subscribe RSS
The Blogs 
. Or 67 litres per MONTH. Is this realistic? Most cars consume that much, or even more per WEEK. And that is only for commuting to work. 
==================================
Yeah right! By squeezing every last bit of blood from us? Abdullah, Khairy and the 4th floor boys please go to HELL! Don't look back!