A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Special Reports arrow Malaysia's grand economic plan hit by politics, apathy

Malaysia's grand economic plan hit by politics, apathy PDF Print E-mail
Posted by admin   
Monday, 02 June 2008 13:18

"It's Abdullah's project. If he's not around, no one knows what's going to happen as different prime ministers will have different priorities"

By Kevin Lim and Jalil Hamid, REUTERS

 

Malaysia's plan for a showpiece economic zone in its south is in doubt because of the uncertain fate of the country's prime minister and a lukewarm response from big investors in nearby Singapore. On paper, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's pet project to develop the 2,200 sq kms (850 sq miles) of land in southern Johor state into a economic zone to complement the rich but land-scarce city-state of Singapore looks good. The area has so far drawn $10.5 billion in investment, much of it from the Middle East, riding on investor hopes the area will become a hinterland for the city-state the way that China's booming Shenzhen, once a tiny fishing village, complements neighboring Hong Kong. The Iskandar Malaysia zone, three times bigger than Singapore, would be Malaysia's largest economic zone. The government says it should create 800,000 jobs and attract $100 billion in investment over 25 years.

Its proponents say it could be Southeast Asia's answer to China's Pearl River delta, a manufacturing heartland that turns out more than a quarter of China's worldwide exports. But Malaysia's track record in getting such grand projects off the ground is patchy and Singapore developers are looking to booming China and India instead, worried the plans will be shelved if Abdullah loses power. "It's Abdullah's project. If he's not around, no one knows what's going to happen as different prime ministers will have different priorities," said Suan Teck Kin, an economist at Singapore's United Overseas Bank (UOB). Abdullah's position weakened after the poor showing of his ruling coalition in March polls and speculation is rife he may be forced to resign.

Given this kind of political vacuum in Malaysia, I don't think anyone will be rushing into Iskandar," said Song Seng Wun, a Singapore-based economist at Malaysian bank CIMB. Expensive government development projects have been for years Malaysia's answer to regional economic disparities in a country spread over the Malay peninsula and parts of the island of Borneo. Their success has been mixed at best. UOB's Suan cited a proposed IT zone near the capital Kuala Lumpur as an example of a project that is struggling after its sponsor and Abdullah's predecessor, Mahathir Mohamad, left office.

Singapore wary
State investment arm Khazanah Nasional, which has opened a marketing office in Singapore to promote the Iskandar zone, brushed off political concerns and said investors are committed to Malaysia. Mainly Muslim Malaysia has been a magnet for Middle Eastern investors flush with petrodollars who have been snapping up banks, hotels and malls. Abu Dhabi investment arm Mubadala Development Co is leading a consortium to develop a multi-billion dollar city within Iskandar. Kuala Lumpur has also established itself as a leading centre in Asia for the burgeoning Islamic Finance market.

But state-linked Singapore developers have been cool to Iskandar. Many analysts say for it to really take off, it needs Singapore firms such as CapitaLand to develop on land that costs as little as 1/30th of Singapore land. "Singapore investments could be very crucial for Iskandar," said Malaysian political analyst Khoo Kay Peng. "Malaysia needs investments in high-technology areas such as biotech, rather than just a pure real estate play," he said. Singapore developers are wary after they got burned by frequent and unexpected policy changes during Mahathir's reign, said the head of investments at one Singapore firm. The two countries have a long history of strained relations dating back to 1963 when they gained independence from the British as a federation only to split up two years later. At the time Singapore feared it could not survive on its own with no natural resources and squeezed into an area half the size of Greater London. But since then the island has established itself as a major Asian business and finance centre competing with Hong Kong.

However, it lacks a readily available pool of land and labor that booming southern China offers to Hong Kong, and south Malaysia's development plans aim to fill that void. Yet rather than counting on its neighbors, Singapore has tried to overcome the lack of space by reclaiming land from the sea and shifting factories to the neighboring Indonesian island of Batam. Local firms in their quest for profits and growth are also looking further afield to booming economies of China, Vietnam and India. For example, a group of Singapore government-backed firms led by Keppel Corp is building an "eco-city" in China, while state firm Ascendas manages business parks in five Indian cities.

And despite Malaysian lobbying, Singapore's official response to the project did not go beyond forming a joint committee with its neighbor. The plan also has its critics in Malaysia. Mahatir, who still pulls considerable weight in local politics, recently described the blueprint as "a platform for Singapore to expand its sovereignty." "In the end the area ... will be filled with Singaporeans and populated only with 15 percent of Malays," he said.

Comments (26)Add Comment
...
written by Maggie, June 02, 2008 13:30:28
If the PM wants to compare Iskandar to Shenzen, does him, its Govt servants and locals have the mentality , attitude, competitiveness and transparency like the Chineses in China? Spore definitely fit the equation as HK in the Shenzen-HK plan.
If you use the Causeway nowadays , you can 't tell what time or how long it need you to get across. With that uncertainty, how can Iskandar and JB succeed when the main fundamental is not properly addressed?
I reckoned we need to build at least another 2 more bridges between both countries before we can really any progress in Iskandar.
The announcements made on possible foreign investments remained announcements only. I have not seen any real progress .
With Tun's statement, it makes the situation worst as it mean he preferred JB to remain the backwater of Spore instead of capitalising on Spore's growth.Its time to wake up, the world is not gonna wait for us to get rid of our antiquated race-based fears.
The best and the most competitive will win and not those who depend on Govt's crutches.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 38
...
written by SeriousLy, June 02, 2008 13:30:53
You know what the weird thing is? Malays in Singapore do not want to live in Malaysia!
report abuse
disagree 6
agree 76
...
written by Arubin, June 02, 2008 13:33:53
What I want to know is how on earth did Malaysia sink so low that its biggest upcoming project is to construct a supporting economic zone for Singapore.

Why is it that its not Kuala Lumpur that is prosperous instead, with economic development being focused on its suburbs?

Someone screwed up bigtime somewhere...bah...
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 33
...
written by Commonsenses, June 02, 2008 13:40:57
Sad to say Iskandar will remain a dream as long as we have TDM and johor UMNO to reacon with. The people will suffer further with an UMNO state government in johor.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 38
...
written by uncleleow, June 02, 2008 13:49:25
Malaysia only need Sing dollar not sing investment. If Singaporean are smart, there are plenty of places to invest than Johor, which has long history of anti-Singapore. Unless, UMNO really turn 180 degree, nothing going to happen in Iskandar and it will turn into a massive white elephant something like Kulim Hi tech.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 32
...
written by indianputra, June 02, 2008 14:06:36
There is a simple solution. Pak Lah must go...
report abuse
disagree 6
agree 9
...
written by TWOG, June 02, 2008 14:13:11
This economic zone was originally known as South Johor Economic Region. It was later renamed Iskandar Development Region - maybe a shrewd political move to stoke the ego of the namesake. The RM100 billion question is - was it renamed after Sultan Iskandar of Johor or Mahathir a/l Mohammad Iskandar Kutty?

After the fiasco of losing Pedra Branca, there are calls from brain-dead nationalists to be careful about IDR in case it suffers the same fate. Here we have a potential big-time investor who would be key to the success of the IDR and who is very reluctant to participate because of the constant flip-flopping of policies and the Mahathir inspired rabid xenophobes trying to prevent Singapore from taking away IDR's "sovereignty". Don't these xenophobes know that they are doing Singapore a very big favour? Now, Singapore can honourably and with good reasons, decline the invitation. Keep the IDR to yourself - thanks, but no thanks...
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 23
...
written by Msian 2, June 02, 2008 14:22:47
Of course, no doubts about whats to expect from all these grand economic corridors. In the first place I wonder where the country can suddenly find so much money to open all these corridors. And the greatest joke is the govt. expect the world to flock to Malaysia to set up business when theres lack of meritocracies & tons of corruptions & potential racial problems. If I am a businessman, I may as well set up shop in China, India, Thailand or Vietnam.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 22
...
written by sydput, June 02, 2008 14:29:34
You know what the weird thing is? Malays in Singapore do not want to live in Malaysia!
-------
There are many singaporean malays already in Malaysia- Only you cannot see them as they blend in better than indonesians. Many more make a living here including big names like Ramli sarip and one time Fandi Ahmad.
---------------
My personal opinion is that the iskandar development region, due to its location, will be enough to attract foreign investors. All the johore govenrment have to do is to improve the infrasructure, and reduce toll for using the 2nd link and connectung ro***. This will reduce congestion at causeway. There should be a highway along the southern coast of johore to link port of tanjung pelepas to Pasir gudang all the way to tanjung langsat.
report abuse
disagree 14
agree 7
...
written by Zapper, June 02, 2008 14:33:21
Ahoy.....Hong Kong and Shenzhen are one country with different political systems. How dumb can you be??
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 7
...
written by InEffective, June 02, 2008 14:48:51
No investor will trust Malaysian 'bendable laws' - not with our malleable buy-one get-one-free judges and conjured laws and rulings (who pledge allegiance to the business extortionists masquerading as politicians)

Unless of course, all arbitration in the Iskandar region is conducted in Singapore.

(i can just see all the firms scratching he*** trying to figure out risk-premiums in Umno. In most planning, they factor country risk, no textbook carries racist-risks).
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by Mr Smith, June 02, 2008 15:08:44
There is a panacea for all of Malaysia's ills - a Pakatan Federal Government.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 13
...
written by Tok Din, June 02, 2008 15:32:43
Why should anyone in their right mind invest if Malaysia ? With China, India, Russia and Brazil opening up, there are many options all over the world. Malaysia was perhaps an attractive option in the 1970s and 1980s when the cold war was in progress. We lost that opportunity when Vietnam, China, Russia and India were closed markets. If we think that we can attract the Middle East money, please be realistic. Middle East invests more in the west through their fund managers than doing so directly.

Any investor knows that Malaysia is not a good place for long term investment. The cost of doing business in Malaysia is high relatively to new emerging markets. Malaysia does not promote meritocracy and public accountability. Corruption and inefficiency are just added costs of doing business.

Malaysians continue to divide themselves into race, party, religion, class and region. These are serious issues which work against the development of a cohesive work force. The quality of human capital from the local universities and colleges infected with the race biased culture is rather cost.

If the focus of these mega projects is real estate development such as hotels, retirement homes, resorts and entertainment and shopping complexes catering to the Middle East tourists then there is a chance. If they are for high tech, bio-tech etc, they have no chance at all.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 24
...
written by Everbright, June 02, 2008 16:08:47
There are actually many Singaporean SME's operating very successfully in Malaysia. The custom and fiscal laws here are good, no problems or harrassment from any authorities. The immigration laws are a headache as they flip-flop too much. Our Malaysian engineers are as bright as any and recruitment and retention is a plus. I for one believe that the Iskandar project can be successful provided our leaders go back to basics and trash out the long-standing problems with Singapore. We are talking about (1) CPF (2) water (3) Keretapi (4) Bridge (5) Sand. If AAB cannot resolve these, he is as useless as they come by. Better let DSAI sort it out. Let's learn to live with richer neighbors than to fight with Singapore. Most of these issues were legacy-issues, before most of us were born. So let's settle these once and for all. Then Iskandar will definitely take off. Believe me, there are many for Singapore Manufactureres to relocate to Johor. We should also explore the (6) Fast Train project and (7) MRT expansion into Johor. Think positively guys instead of condemning the Iskandar project. We can't ignore Singapore. It will be a "Switzerland" of Asia in the future. Once their 2 IR projects takes off, they will be flying. At the end of the day, many Malaysians will find themselves eaking out a honest living from a Singaporean company. What's wrong with that?
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 9
...
written by AYKC, June 02, 2008 16:24:31
Hahahaha ....Fandi Ahmad and Ramli Sarip sees opportunity in Malaysia, taking advantage of the Cavemen mentality of their counterpart in Malaysia, harping on race ...... Settling down in Malaysia will be the last thing on their mind.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by cheemengwong, June 02, 2008 16:53:21
If Malaysian political leaders do less politicking and more work, imagine what will Malaysia be today?

The Malaysian politicians has been playing politics and enriching themselves all these years at the expense of the Raayat and the economic well being of Malaysia.

The biggest culprit is BN whose main component parties are UMNO, MCA, MIC and Gerakan....

The upper echleon of these leaders are FAT and RICH!!!.

If they have put on the zeal, effort, and sincerity like that of the Sigaporeans, Malaysia would have become the most developed country in South East Asia!!!.

Instead we are no being risk of being overtaken by countries like Vietnam and Cambodia.

Malaysia will slide down to the level of Zimbabwee in no time if the same leaders are not removed!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 10
...
written by Jan, June 02, 2008 18:17:49
After the racist statement by the johor MB do you think the Singaporeans are so hard up to come and invest in Iskandar? They have a better place to go in BATAM.
Ghani can go stuff it up his you-know-where for all they care.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by benny loh, June 02, 2008 20:19:30


this one (making much racistt remarks these days) abandoning what he plan for and the one succeeding him has no interest at all,
http://malaysiancartoons.blogs...aysia.html
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by Uncorruptible, June 02, 2008 20:47:50
Malaysian Exposes - Wireless@KL Broadband Scam
what others only whisper

Rec
ently Packet One Networks in collaboration with DBKL and others, introduced a "free" wireless broadband service designed to "transform Kuala Lumpur into a world-class wireless city".
In these times of spiralling inflation, any free offer would be welcomed. But is this offer really free?
In the first place, the offer is "free" for 512kbps access. What is 512kbps when 1mbps is considered slow nowadays, especially at peak times? Its like giving you 50 sen, what can you buy with that? Not even a glass of kopi-o!

Yet there is more to insult to our intelligence. Examine their areas of coverage. If we think we can have this access all a long, say Jalan Raja Laut, we are sadly disappointed (like the Star reporter Jade Chan found out). The base stations are placed in restaurants and cafes which pay fees to Wireless@KL. That is how Wireless@KL make their money. To get this free 512kbps, you cannot be simply squatting at the doorway of the cafe, opening up your notebook, and surf to your hearts' content. To conceal our kiasu -ness, we will have to go into the cafe and order a drink, probably costing an arm. And that is how the cafes etc will get back their licence fees, plus extra business . But isn't that what is already happening at wi-fi hotspots?

Of course you will have slooow downlo*** at 512 kbps. And when you start cursing, Wireless@KL will amble along with an "offer" for 1mb kbps. This is where they hope to make a kill. All this with the involvement of DBKL to boot. These are some of the catches, there are probably more coming.

So if you are thinking of buying a notebook and taking advantage of this offer, DON'T. Surfing at internet cafes at RM2.00 an hour is cheaper. And you don't have to lug a notebook all over the place. Plus cheaper coffee.

Getting a licence to set up broadband is a cash cow. Wireless@KL claims the total investment will be RM60 million. Getting say, half a million subscribers at the competitive rate of RM 90.00 pm, the company will be laughing all the way to the Banks in just two months!

Which brings us to the truly good news that the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor Government will be launching soon their own wireless broadbank network. It should be as good, and cheaper. In order to have high penetration in homes, I believe the government should provide internet access for 1mb kpbs free or cheap.
I do hope the Selangor Government Broadband will extend to KL as well, so that we need not be held to ransom and be exploited any more.

report abuse
disagree 3
agree 2
...
written by jjireh99, June 02, 2008 22:28:26
There are only 2 things pending if we want to be a successful and business oriented country where investors would want to flock here.

1. Get rid of all BN goons (no need to mention names. We all know who they are and who should go)

2. Get DSAI to helm the ship's rudder for a smoother sail

What's so hard about that? No need to talk so much any more or analyse this and that. I truly believe that BN cannot reform anymore no matter which way they turn because it's still the same old people at the end of the day and is not only not relevant anymore but they are beyond redemption. Too deep into self-attainment.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by mgeo, June 02, 2008 22:50:52
Another real estate scam like Putrajaya and every "property development" that every person who knows someone in an Exco wants to start.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by axeltung, June 03, 2008 00:58:21
Iskandar project is not going to be success in any manners...because this project is initiated by UMNO and contented of so many political factors, corruptions and different perception between federal and state govt!!

If you want to compare Hong Kong/Shengzhen and Iskandar.....it's far far away....~sigh~
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by gx27, June 03, 2008 09:39:18
Hangat hangat tahi ayam. Malaysian way. Dragon's head snake's tail.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by TWOG, June 03, 2008 10:13:50
written by Everbright, June 02, 2008 | 16:08:47
We are talking about (1) CPF (2) water (3) Keretapi (4) Bridge (5) Sand. If AAB cannot resolve these, he is as useless as they come by. Better let DSAI sort it out. Let's learn to live with richer neighbors than to fight with Singapore. Most of these issues were legacy-issues, before most of us were born.

Everbright - slight correction here. These issues are not that old. These are not legacy issues. Most of us were already born and in fact know why they surfaced and became intractable - due to one man's hatred and greed. All the issues were sorted out. Even the KTM land was resolved - exchange the tract of land along the railway for a big piece of prime real estate at Tanjong Pagar plus a super prime land in Marina South. The Points of Agreement for KTM, CPF funds, water, sand, etc were already agreed upon and signed by Daim. For whatever reason, TDM refused to ratify it, saying that Daim's signature tak pakai. Can you imagine that? Send a senior Minister to negotiate and sign the documents and then later break your word and say that the Minister has no power. WTF - if he has no power to sign, then why the heck sent him to sign? My gut feel was that, as usual, somebody gets greedy and wanted more.

How to deal with such people? Keep shifting the goal posts. Everbright - please check what I has written here. I am not making this up. Just to ease your mind, you can already see this flip-flopping of decisions and policies at work in the last few weeks. Before the ICJ announced its decision on Pedra Branca, Malaysia and Singapore both declared that they will abide by the decision and that it is FINAL. Now, Malaysia is breaking its promise. Ban on foreign registered cars topping up petrol in Malaysia. On, off, on, off, on, off... Can somebody switch off hazard lights blinking on and off - it is driving me bonkers.

smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Dominic, June 03, 2008 15:26:35
It doesnt really matter whether such project is next to Singapore or anywhere in Malaysia,investors will still flock to Malaysia if only our political climate and good goverance are in place. Even ordianary Malaysians have doubth and apprehension what more do you expect from someone who comes in with fat wallet in the billions. The moment this type of money comes in,it will disappear in no time . Some groons will be laughing all the way to the bank. The govt better teach the farmers how to grow more food within their own plot of land . Global investors are no fools. The only factor worth considering for them is the ideal climate with large tract of furtile which the govt failed to capitalised on ! Tell me which leader really care and put the people`s interest before anything else ? NO, no one. It will forever remain as such . Thats the sori state of Malaysia today !
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by SamBall, June 04, 2008 03:16:12
Rename as Iskandar Kutty; problem solved. Perhaps the mamak will give his blessing la; aiyo don't know also

mamaktir wants his name to be etched forever la; despite the crooked brdge fiasco.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

 
** SPONSORED LINKS **
Will NATO become a global army? More..

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Close down the NATO, says the conference statement on the recently concluded and successful International Conference on NATO & Its Policies in ASIA.

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM