A+ | A- | Reset
To write comment, please LOGIN at content-page.
Home

ALERT

  • RPK'S sedition trial  postponed to 10-12 November.

Sponsored Links

Spring Bed
Chambers Translation
 Laser Comb Treatment
Babi... Ooooi Babi PDF Print E-mail
Posted by labisman   
Monday, 14 April 2008 23:22

From an economic perspective it is better to rear pigs than cows or goat. It is simply more profitable. The pregnancy duration is about 112-115 days compared to goat which is about 150 days or a cow 290 days. At the end of each pregnancy the pig produces between 12- 15 piglets, the goat about 1-2 kids and the cow 1 calf.

I have been following the story of the construction of a centralized and modern pig farm in Kampung Tumbuk in Kuala Langat and how the issue of religious sensitivity and racial cards has been played by the Opposition (i.e. The BN people) in Selangor. The issue also appears to have been made worst by the lopsided reporting by the Malay newspaper which obviously is trying to incite racial sentiments. Please allow me to share my views as a Muslim on the matter.


The religion perspective of pork.

From the bible

Both the Bible and the Quran prohibit the eating of pork. Muslims are aware of this prohibition and observe it strictly. However, most readers of the Bible say they do not know where they can find this in the Bible.

In the book of Leviticus, chapter 11, v. 7, it is recorded that God declares the pig to be unclean for believers. Then, in verse 8, God says: “You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you”. This command is repeated in Deuteronomy 14:7-8. Then, in Isaiah 65:2-4, and 66:17, God issues a stern warning against those who eat pork.

Some Christians are aware of this prohibition from God, but they say that they can eat pork because St. Paul said that all food is clean in his letter to the Romans 14:20. St. Paul said this because he believed (as he wrote in his letter to the Ephesians 2:14-15) that Jesus had abolished the Law with all its commandments and regulations. He seems, however, to have misunderstood what he heard about Jesus.

In the Gospel According to Matthew 5:17-20, Jesus is reported to have said quite the contrary, as follows: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law . . . .” Jesus then went on in that passage (in verse 19) to denounce anyone who would break the smallest commandment and teach others likewise. He also praised his true followers who will practice and teach even the smallest commandment. One of the commandments, as we have seen, is to stay away from pork.

This is why the true followers of Jesus, holding on to his teachings, did not let unclean food such as pork enter their mouths, so that Peter, the chief disciple, can say, “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean” (Acts of the Apostles, ch. 10, v. 14)

Five chapters later in the Acts of the Apostles, 15:29, we find that the original disciples still differentiate between clean and unclean foods, and this time Paul is in agreement with them. Six chapters later, in ch. 21, v. 25, their decision to impose food regulations on believers is mentioned without regret, and this time Paul is challenged to prove that he is in agreement with them; and he demonstrated his full agreement with them.

What remains, then, is that Jesus, on whom be peace, upheld the prohibition against pork. His disciples also upheld it, and so must all his followers. Those who fail to uphold it need to be informed and reminded of this rule from God. For the same argument many orthodox Jews don’t eat pork.

Islamic perspective

In Islam, the eating of swine is forbidden. This is clearly demonstrated in many verses of the Quran. Among others this includes: [1] 5:3, 6:145, 16:114-115; [2] 2:168-169, 3:93-94, 6:119, 10:59; [3] 5:90-91. My research has failed to find any evidence that suggest that the religion do not allow muslims to be standing next to or to look at or to smell a pig. Maybe some people in authority can highlight further on this issue.


The Scientific perspective

Dr. E. Kazim. M.D. in his article “Medical aspects of forbidden foods in Islam” (July 1981 issue of Muslim Journal has described diseases carried or caused by the flesh of the swine.

He wrote: The pig is a scavenger. It is an omnivorous animal. It eats everything. There are many diseases carried from swine to man, particularly parasite infestations. Lately extensive research has been focused on senility-old age is characterized by hardening of inner lining of the blood vessels of the heart; brain etc. a process called atherosclerosis. When a clot forms, it results in coronary thrombosis or a heart attack, cerebral thrombosis or stroke.

Different dietary factors are responsible for atherosclerosis. Gross atheroma may be produced in rabbit by feeding it with cholesterol, but when you add lard (derived from hog fat) to the cholesterol, the incidence of atheroma is increased and thus you would produce coronary thrombosis, and myocardial infraction.

Besides, lard contains 2800 units of vitamin D per 100 grams and no vitamin A at all. Lately vitamin D has been held responsible for atheroma, by causing increased absorption of calcium in the blood vessels. In human beings, serum cholesterol is not dependent on the intake of cholesterol in the diet, but depends upon the proportion of animal fats in the diet, which elevates the beta-lipo protein level in the blood. Animal fats contain saturated fatty acids and these saturated fatty acids have been found to be as one of the causes of atheroma in man.

Medium fat bacon contains 25% proteins and 55% fat.

According to medical research, the fat content in pork is more than any other meat (beef, mutton etc.) and it takes longer to digest. Dr. M Jaffer in an article in the Islamic Review (London) of January 1997 issue has listed 16 kinds of harmful germs, which have been discovered in pork in modern researches and the diseases, which could be caused by them. The number of patients suffering from tapeworm disease is the highest in the world among pork eating nations.

Other diseases attributed to pigs are caused by tri-chinelia spirates and intestinal worms occupy first place among such nations too.

Dr. Glen Shepherd wrote the following on the dangers of eating pork in Washington Post (31 May 1952). “One in six people in USA and Canada have germs in their muscles - trichinosis 8 from eating pork infected with trichina worms. Many people who are infected shows no symptoms. Most of those, who do have, recover slowly. Some die; some are reduced to permanent invalids. All were careless pork caters”.

He continued “No one is immune from the disease and there is no cure. Neither antibiotics nor drugs or vaccines affect these tiny deadly worms. Preventing infection is the real answer.”

The Babi and the narrow minded politicians who called themselves Muslims.

First of all, I am appalled at the narrow minded politicians who made the issue of building a centralized and modern pig farming an issue. It is beyond doubt that the real issue here is economy, environmental pollution and improving quality of life in the surrounding community.

The opposition (BN) are making a mockery of this just because of political mileage. I feel when something good is being done; it should promoted by all parties. I have travelled to St Louis , USA where it is also known capital pork of the world. I have visited and stand 3 feet away from a pig pen. There was no smell. It was so dam clean. It is even cleaner than public toilets in Malaysia .

How many of this politician has visited such a farm and how many are involved in goat farming in Malaysia . While goat is Halal in Malaysia , please enter many farms there is in Malaysia and you will see how dirty it is. Islam only prohibits the eating of pork. There is no prohibition of looking at eat or standing next to one. In fact I have yet to find anywhere in the Quran that prevent Muslims from rearing it. During my 15 months tour of duty with UN in Cambodia, many Malay Champa who are strong Muslims rear pigs under their house for economic reason even though they don’t eat them.

From an economic perspective it is better to rear pigs than cows or goat. It is simply more profitable. The pregnancy duration is about 112-115 days compared to goat which is about 150 days or a cow 290 days. At the end of each pregnancy the pig produces between 12- 15 piglets, the goat about 1-2 kids and the cow 1 calf.

From an environmental perspective, it is definitely better to have a central farm where small farmers join hands and run one big and clean farm. This way the cleanliness of our water way will be maintained. Waste management will become the epicentre of the operation. It is more economical to run one big farm than many small farms that is polluting. Overall it is a win win situation for everyone.

It is insulting the way some politician look at the issue. I believe from Islamic  perspective it is quite clear. It is the narrow minded politicians that played up the issue that makes it into a Muslim and non Muslim issue and trying to create a bigger racial divide among Malaysians. Sometimes I wonder, which has  the lower image , the babi or these politicians. For that aspect, I respect the position taken by PAS on this matter. It has shown that it has handled the issues properly.

I ask all level minded Malaysian and to re look at the “Babi” issue again. Study the real issue properly and make a proper judgment. Overall it will benefit Malaysian from the economic, environmental and quality of life perspective.

 

Dr Mohamed Rafick Khan bin Abdul Rahman

Comments (71)Add Comment
...
written by Countach, April 14, 2008 23:27:29
St Louis, Usa, pork capital of the world.

Malaysia, corruption capital of the world. International Iso 2020 standard. Way ahead of its time, Tallest, longgest, biggest, fattest, whatever.

Courtesy of Mahathir, the Father of Corruption.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +109
...
written by singam, April 14, 2008 23:36:22
The ultimate idiocy may well have taken place in Penang where Sungai Babi got renamed Sungai Bab1. I kid you not!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +18
...
written by Jan, April 14, 2008 23:38:00
I don't know if the pork contains so much germs, viruses and parasites but I do know the Germans and the Japanese are lovers of pork meat and are among the longest living people in the world.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +85
...
written by RumahPanjai, April 14, 2008 23:38:09
A very well reasoned and written piece. You nip it right on the bud. We need to diseminate this to the local folks to think outside the square that is perpetuated by UMNO. Why is it that when it comes to the innocent "BABI" politicians would jump on the bandwagon and bring up religion? Political miliage?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +56
...
written by cklife, April 14, 2008 23:49:45
Everything you do, there's a risk involve.

To me, if GOD really don't want us to eat pork.
THEN WHY HE CREATE IT?

Come on guys, nothing's safe. Not even chicken, beef, deer, mushrooms and other veges. There are risk involved in anything you consume.

So, eat well, not too much of chicken, not too much of pork,
not too much of Coke, not too much of alcohol.
Keep in balance.

Why not discuss the nutrition of pork?
It's one sided.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +49
...
written by loko Ono, April 14, 2008 23:50:11
"St Louis, Usa, pork capital of the world. Malaysia, corruption capital of the world."

How the hell is this relevant? Simply use this post to vent your frustation ke? Pi lah cari posting yang lagi relevant..
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -34
...
written by pillars, April 14, 2008 23:52:49
My respect to you Sir for writing this eye opening article.

My opinion I think beside religion perspective on pork, these days we have to be careful on almost everything we consume. Hello ... dun forget mad cow disease, bird flu, and high level pesticides on fruits n veggies. Do you all notice most of fruit skins now are shinier and waxy (especially apples).

It is said that people only concentrate on pork.

Besides the scientific perspective of pork, junk food also dangerous for health. But then again pork is a hotter subject compare with junk food. Sad case.





report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +42
...
written by Uncorruptible, April 14, 2008 23:56:09
What the "researchers" don't tell you is that our nenek-moyang, ancestors, survived mainly on eating pork because pigs were plentiful everywhere. Like God send manna. If pork was so "unclean", our ancestors would have died out longer ago, and we would not be here today ! Are beef and mutton better? What about the hoof and mouth diseases that frequently strikes these animals? What about the Mad cow disease that is so lethal ? Now with the bird flu, chickens are no better? Pork at least haave never passed any such dangerous diseases to man, unlike the other animals. So actually pork is safer to consume than beef or mutton or chicken !!! smilies/cheesy.gif Hey man, be realistic. There are germs everywhere, just cook them meat well and you'll be all right. Historically, it has been PROVEN that consuming pork is okay !
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +43
...
written by Krazee, April 15, 2008 00:00:36
Sigh, and argument to support specific reasons.
From the acts of the Apostles Chap 11. ‘What God has made clean, you are not to call profane.’
My friends, "what goes into the mouth is not unclean but what comes out of it is"
My understanding is that pork was prohibited due to the outbreak of swine fever that causes it to be passed to those who take them.
If you cannot take Pork for whatever reason, so be it and nobody is going to force you to do so. Just because you cannot do so does not mean that others should not and please, there's no need to justify with studies because Pork have been consumed for centuries and is proven not to be any worse than other meat.
It is precisely this holier than thou attitude of trying to prevent others that led to the collapse of a 4 Billion ringgit business.
In fact, there is no substitution for Pork...unlike other meats char siew and roasted pork is good only with pork... substitude with daging merah or chicken does not even come close....slurrrrrrp..
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +37
...
written by oster, April 15, 2008 00:02:17
There are varying Christian interpretations on when the eating of previously forbidden meats were sanctioned, and I think it's a bit arbitrary for the author to come to absolute conclusions.

Many Christians would cite Matthew 15:10, "Listen and understand. What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him 'unclean.'" as changing the perception of previous laws and taking the old definition of foodstuff making one unclean a change in dietary laws as well. Do note that Jesus broke many laws from the Old Testament as well (the Sabbath restrictions included) and is interpreted, in talking about a new covenant and rebuilding the destroyed temple, as altering or rendering null many previous laws.

You make a very level-headed argument about the issue, it must be said. Indeed, the focus should not be on what animals are being bred, but how they are being bred.

In the US and Europe, there are pig barns where people entering must sterilise themselves for fear of actually infecting the pigs (yes, in terms of microbes, these pigs are actually cleaner). This arises due to the fact that rearing techniques can actually keep pigs very far from harmful microorganisms, at the cost of the pig's freedom.

Therefore, people DO have the right to complain about the pig project, but ONLY if they find faults in its implementation, not because of its existence alone.

cheers
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +38
...
written by noyawns, April 15, 2008 00:05:33
Oink, Oink - Writer here is basically showing that pib farming done properly should not be made into an issue. All who wanna eat pork, go ahead - why club this writer? Wanna eat what also go ahead la...Constitution allows it smilies/wink.gif smilies/grin.gif

Thanks for clearing the Stink on this issue, Doc. I shall forever love my bacon! smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/tongue.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +34
...
written by Legion, April 15, 2008 00:09:39
Uncooked pork is full of germs and bacteria. Cooked pork cannot even guarantee that the germs and bacteria are properly killed.

Thank god I have worked in pork-free countries before and have lower tolerance for pork.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -29
...
written by NancyL, April 15, 2008 00:12:24
Oink-oink.....yes indeed Dr. Rafick Khan.....I think you are right...

Please it would be honour if you can be the first Muslim in Malaysia to rear pigs as your business...please do that....please make the first pioneer project to show the Malay that you can do that....and make sure all the workers are Malays ok...this is to prove that the Opposition Party just want to make a hooohaaa about this....and this is to prove that Malays can also rear pigs likes Chinese also....

But please dont be dissapointed...if the Malays dont want to work there....if this happens dont give up.....you need to ask your family to help you in the pig farm inorder to make this successful.....you must prove to the Muslims in Malaysia that Malays can also rear pigs like others....

By the way from your name are you from Pakistan or India???...salute to you.....
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -35
...
written by NancyL, April 15, 2008 00:14:44
oh maybe you from South Africa?....just curious...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -30
...
written by Negarakuku, April 15, 2008 00:16:54
I urged Muslims not to eat pork because the price will go up when the demand is higher. smilies/grin.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/wink.gif smilies/smiley.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +22
...
written by Areka, April 15, 2008 00:18:13
Hi, Dr Rafick,

Firstly, allow me and accept my sincere apologies for my previous comments on your previous articles. I have read your blogs and I respect your opinions (although not all I agreed with your opinions and comments).

You have written this article well and I agree with you that we have many narrow-minded politicians who played up this "Babi" issue.

Whether to consume pork, I am of opinion that it is up to each individual and let us all respect their rights.

There are many types of animals which cannot be eaten, be they in religious or health perspective, but there are still people who consume them. We have no right to stop them (from consuming), just respect their right.

To consume the meat of an animal and to rear it are different matters. You are right and I agree with you fully that it is a good move of the Selangor Government to build a centralized modern pig farm.

To those " NARROWED MINDED POLITICIANS " , allow me to ask all of you, " WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM TO THIS CENTRALIZED MODERN PIG FARM ? "
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +26
...
written by k loon, April 15, 2008 00:33:06
Thank to the writer

It's a proven fact that pig carry lot's of disease that possible to infect human. It's also a proven fact that pig helped a lot in medical science due to it's similarity to human organ and muscle texture (do you know that b4 crash dummy was created, pig and human corpse are used for car crash and other experiment?)

It's also a proven fact that non-muslim around the world love pork.

Back to Malaysia, it's true pig farming its a issue here. Even the name "babi" have to call "khinzir" and in public seminar/talk, words/examples regarding "babi" are seldom used if there's muslim around.

I have to agree to our fellow muslim, the standard pig farming in Malaysia really bad. Very bad. Even I won't stay near a pig farm, so cant I blame the muslim for banning pig farming in the own backyard?

Tolerance is what keep us Malaysia so unique and this words are long gone (misused) under the opposition(BN) govern. Remember the Melaka pig farm that was closed down by the "MB" for no apparent reason (well, the MB said the farm was closed for new development but nothing was done after the farm closed).

You can't just shutdown a family long time business just to make certain group happy. You need to find a solution, and this is what the government are trying to do (PK).

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +29
...
written by marcusg, April 15, 2008 00:35:27
Excellent article, especially regarding Christianity and the unclean pork (must dig up my dusty bible to check back those verses!)

Unfortunately, the THREAT of the parasite Trichinella spiralis is grossly exaggerated in your article, which quotes a 1952 (more than 5 decade!) source which says "no cure". Untrue.

Trichenellosis can be treated with combination of steroids and any modern-day anti-parasitic medication, e.g. albendazole (you can buy this at Guardian's or Watson, otherwise know as Zentel. Primary school children in Malaysia are routinely given this for hookworm infestation)

CDC article regarding this 'pig worm':
http://www.dpd.cdc.gov/dpdx/HTML/Trichinosis.htm

This parasite is much commonly found in Europe and USA, where it is transmitted by eating improperly cooked meat (usually game like bear, dear, or any other carnivore or omnivore, not just piggies alone) Besides, i have not come across any malaysian eating RAW pork, except maybe at Korean BBQs
smilies/tongue.gif

However, you don't need a medical degree to tell you the link between animal fat and heart disease, haha.. thats just common sense.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +28
...
written by ismhakim, April 15, 2008 00:39:16
Dr Mohamed Rafick Khan

What you said about the economics of pig rearing vs goat or cow rearing is absolutely correct. In fact many UN agencies involved in poverty alleviation work in developing countries (subject to religious constraints) recommend pig rearing as a quick source of income in the rural areas - the advantage of integrated farming system, with the recycling or farm and animal wastes and pig manure for production of methane gas for energy andelectrification supply in rural households. Those who do not know this should read the World Bank, Asian Dev Bank, UNDP reports on the economic advantage of the pig production industry.

The problem on pigs in Malaysia is the over strict application of Islam by the religious fundamentalists so much so that the pig is seen as worse than the devil (Syaitan), with the next evil or the " untouchable" animal is the man's best friend, the dog.

It takes a huge leap of liberalisation of the mind of the Malay muslims (including the most educated) to come to terms with issues of the pig and the dog in the context of Islam. I find that the devout muslims in the middle east,eg egypt, and when come face to face with the pig or pork.

I have a different view than yours on the issue of pork and the bible.

What you have quoted is from the Old Testament. That's Jewish history and Jews don't it pork. And the arab nation is a semitic nation, coming from as biblical history says, through the first son of Abraham. Many of the culinary restrictions of Islam came through Judaism.

As for Jesus, he is Jewish rabbi, and he did not eat of course. But Jesus is NOT a Christian.

Modern day Christianity comes from Paul ie Pauline Christianity and based on the edict of Paul that the coming of Jesus replaces the Mosaic Law and the the salvation promised to the descendants of Abraham can also be obtained by the gentiles if only they believed in Jesus as the Christ.

You are right in the New Testament that Jesus did say he came not to abolish the law. But Paul who had his road to Damascus experience said otherwise and it was his word that carried.

Anyway, biblical scholars have concluded that the New Testament, ie stories about Jesus were first written down only some 50 years after the Jesus was alive on earth (as the Christians would say) and the fourth gospel came into being some 100-150 years later.

So I think quoting the old testament and quotes from Jesus are abit out of context for Malaysians, because the non muslims ( besides the hindus and buddhists ect) are Christians, not Jews. They follow the interpretation of Paul. A point to note is that modern day Jews are still pretty mad with Paul because they blame Paul for taking Christianity totally out of its Jewish roots. If not for Paul, and the fact that the Jerusalem church lost the battle with the Church in Rome, Christianity would have been a Jewish sect or cult.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +19
...
written by apa jadi, April 15, 2008 00:39:32
Since there are so much of "scientific research from Islamic perspective", how about mad cow disease from religious point of view? Anyone? (I was in UK in the 80s. Till today, I am barred from donating blood, despite avoiding beef on most know occasions.)

The question now is: is there any animal that is disease free that we can consume safely? Is there any animal that has all the vitamins safe for humans? A balanced diet from just one source of food?

So, all craps on this kind of argument will go on and on from a lopsided "perspective".


Babi....oink..babi, who are the kepala babi who created all these farce? Can't the they leave the real babi alone?

So, come Dr. Mohamed Rafick's jingle that is so refreshing in the midst of rumbles.

Sometimes I wonder, which has the lower image , the babi or these zealot politicians??? Well said DR Rafick smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +11
...
written by Negarakuku, April 15, 2008 00:49:28
Do you know that BABI is the holiest animal on earth. WHY?

Only the parts from BABI can be used as substitute to human body parts. In future, Scientist can even plant human organs to function properly first, as a test pilot, in the BABI body before using it on human. That is why BABI is the holiest of all animal in the world !!! smilies/kiss.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by mykantree, April 15, 2008 00:52:38
Scientifically speaking, all animals carry disease, some inherent, some acquired.So consuming any animal meat entails its share of health risk. That's why you cook them before eating them.So the reason that human should not consume pork because of possible sickness is rather ancient. That aside.

Dr Md Rafick raised many valid points why all of us should support the setting up of modern pig farms.Let's not be misled as to the true objectives of those who oppose the Selangor state goverment's inherited plan to set up one in Kg. Tumbuk.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +8
...
written by jokerman, April 15, 2008 01:36:27
On the part regarding Religious perspective of Pork - From the Bible and the Islamic perspective: It is a very sensitive issue and will often provoke the defensive nature of some people. However it is something new for me when you mentioned that the Bible actually prohibits the consumption of pork.

On the part regarding scientific and economic perspective of pork - Yes, it is more economically viable to rear pigs compared to cows or goats due to their almost universal diet and production rate. However, their diet is also their almost universal diet is also their achilie's heel, therefore modern farms should look into scientific formulation of the pig's diets to reduce the risks of diseases.

On the part regarding the Babi and the narrow minded politicians who called themselves Muslims - Again, it indirectly involves Islam and therefore as a non Muslim, not really my league to comment!

However in my opinion, things will get blown out of proportion when one politicizes some agenda in the name of religion. Religions are meant for the well being of the heart and soul. So should one choose to politicize it, one would need to find ways to link the political agenda one is trying to sell with the respective religion. If one manages to (politicize) and the idea sells, then fine. However, should the dots don't seem to join and yet one persists, then we would have something like the Project Babi or the Khalwat with non-Muslim issues.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by songkram, April 15, 2008 01:51:56
PL.
Masjid, Temple& Kuil being there since 17??,our ancestor live harmony in this Land not even yet call as Malaysia.that's why we have BABA & NYONYA.what a nice mix.But few hundred yrs. later things change.Why??? Chinese use to pray to the MOON (Chap goh Meh)they don't now after APOLLO 13.Saloma & P. Ramli well know well accepted artist even in Hong Kong during the 50s.what happen to our artist now? Don't we watch documentary movie how they search for support evidence of the earliest life form in earth.Yes we believe in god,always teaches good things,but beware to thos god messenger if they did it for god.Or else we might end up like Bosnia
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +7
...
written by messrs_stieh, April 15, 2008 02:22:24
thanks, doc, for the sharing of knowledge. however, will check out your views on what is actually said in the bible. thanks. cheers!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by songkram, April 15, 2008 02:34:53
fellow Malaysian
After 50 yrs.Malaysians seem to get more & more holy,until forget about country
agenda, wawasan 2020.All fighting to be a Imum, monk....PIG become wawasan smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif ;
GLOBAL ISU economi negara tak sepenting berbanding BABI PORDA!!sampai bilalah anak malysia baru besar,sedar kita dah ketinggalan.KRISIS ECONOMI,KRISIS MAKANAN,IKLIM DUNIA,apalagi nak TOUR BULAN 2nd time.sedangkan sains pun tak faham.KESIAN betul kat nenek moyang kita .Tingalkan kita bumi yang begitu cantik dan kaya.CHINA,INDIA,BANGALOR pun sudah jauh menang kita.Kita masih bincang pasal kaum MALAYU,CINA dan INDIA.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +5
...
written by kinistau, April 15, 2008 02:37:11
for many hearing or seeing the word 'BABI' itself is a sin.

'Pulau Besar' was 'Pulau Babi Besar'..
So what's with Pulau Babi Besar... May be someone should take the word Babi from Kamus Dewan, coz it make the dictionary non halal.

May be 'Pulau Khinzir Besar' would do the trick.. after 20 years when people get sensitive with the word Khinzir, then we can revert it back to Pulau Babi Besar... and so on.

Better still, just call it 'Pulau the thing Besar'
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +15
...
written by apasalahku, April 15, 2008 02:41:41
truth be told, the Nipah virus outbreak has exposed the pig farmers in Malaysia to be extremely unhygienic, polluting the environment, poor pen conditions; thanks to greed of the farmers and the inspectors
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by Surind Raj, April 15, 2008 03:26:55
Not to mention the benefits of Biogas that comes from a big farm. That's another case study, but basically it is easier to hook up these modern biogas factories employing the latest technology, to one big central farm. Great for the environment! Would you prefer small farms all over the place?

Idiots are not really the msm, the real Idiots are the people whom buy the lies without doing the proper research & examining the evidence.

Dont be so emotional lah Malaysians! Please. You talk about development & growth, it starts with us!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +6
...
written by LKO, April 15, 2008 04:00:57
Dr Rafick's argument on the babi's economic status is his own. I believe that he has done research on that I respect his points on that.

However, (sheesh, not another one) his quoting from the Bible is a bit out of his league. The Bible can't be just cherry picked and strung into a Christian dogma. e.g. Acts chapter 10:14 about Peter's statement is wholly out of context. May I quote verses 11 to 16, which covers verse 14, and you can see that God is tell Peter not to make judgement on what God has made clean.

"11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners. 12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13Then a voice told him, "Get up, Peter. Kill and eat."
14"Surely not, Lord!" Peter replied. "I have never eaten anything impure or unclean."

15The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean."

16This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven."

In fact, some uses these verses to argue that God allows Christian to eat those animals and not the way Dr Rafick explains it! Anyway, the main context of the verses was the 1st breakthrough when Peter was asked by God to preach to the non-Jews which was considered as unclean by the Jews. The early Christian, being brought up in the Jewish traditions considered the Gentiles/non-Jews unclean. The proof is in Acts 11, when Peter explained to the Christian council on his actions:
"18When they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God, saying, "So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life.""

Additionally, in Acts 15:29, Dr Rafick is not quoting properly. Paul has be consistent in his teachings. There is no mention of pork specifically but of how the meat is treated.

"28It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things."

Again, in Acts 21:25, the verse quoted by Dr Rafick, Paul is saying the same thing:
"25As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality"

Even originally halal or kosher food, if already offered to idols, Christians are asked to avoid this. Not so much of the intake, nutritional or spiritual value, but more so to avoid non-Christians of viewing that Christian partake of offerings to idols and thus sharing other gods.

In Christianity, it is not about geting merit or demerit points. It is your personal relationship with God.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +15
...
written by chilten, April 15, 2008 04:07:14
I'm a Malay Muslim and I know it's not a sin to stand next to a pig, smell it and even touch it. You see, in the Quran and hadith, Muslims have never been told that they are forbidden from touching a pig. The only thing that Quran and hadith tell is about the prohibition of eating swine, that's it. So in Islam's perspective, pigs are just like snake . Muslims can take a picture with a snake, touch it, have it as pets but they are forbidden from eating it. So does for pig.

There is a hadith about Muhammad's command to his followers to wash a water container seven times, including once with water soil if it has been licked by a dog. Thus, Muslims believe that dog's saliva are dirty but having dogs as pets, feeding dogs and touching them are not forbidden so it's not a sin to do it.

However, years after prophet Muhammad's death, there comes Imam Shafie who were well respected by Muslims. He used the logic that if Islam says dog's saliva is dirty, pigs must be dirtier. Thus, his followers believe that if they touch a pig, they have to wash their hands 7 times, including one with water soil (even Muhammad never tell them to do so). The weird thing is the 'logic' applies only on pigs, not on a lot of other things that are dirtier than dog's saliva like cat poo, human urine etc.

Now it been more than 1375 years since Muhammad's death and 1187 years since Imam Shafie's death. Muslims in Malaysia have their own rules about pigs and dogs despite what has been taught to them by Muhammad and Imam Shafie. They said Muslims can't eat pork, can't touch pigs, can't stand next to them, can't take a picture with them, can't let pork share the same fridge with their halal food, can't let pig farms being developed and can't let non-Muslims eat their meat. Pigs are like 'cursed animals' that anybody around them will also be cursed and thrown to hell. The same 'unwritten rules' are also applied on dogs.

Well I just feel that it's kinda funny that Malay Muslim have gone too far from the actual teaching. The more serious crime and sins like corruption, lies and riba are usually ignored but the 'false rule' about pigs and dogs are taken too seriously like the entire Islam will be a history if a single Muslim touch a dog/pig or a single Muslim let the non-Muslims develop a pig farm.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +36
...
written by hafidzmalik, April 15, 2008 04:23:51
Cows are usually knocked unconscious by applying an electric shock of 300 volts and 2 amps to the back of the head, effectively stunning the animal. If unsuccessful, secondary methods include the use of a captive bolt pistol to the front of the cows's head. Livestock are also rendered unconscious by pneumatic or cartridge-fired captive bolt stunning and CO2/inert gas stunning. (This step is prohibited under strict application of Halal and Kashrut codes.)Although some animals, mainly pigs and chickens, have their throats slit while fully conscious to be bled to death. [Slaughterhouse]

Some believe electric shock is what cause Mad Cow disease. That's why, we don't get this kind of Mad Cow disease in Malaysia.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by mypanida, April 15, 2008 04:26:50
HOIK.......babi tak mau....tapi char siu tarok lebih.

smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
...
written by smalluncle, April 15, 2008 05:00:12
Aiyoh, veli confuse la on these many PERSPECTIVEs.

How come, under UMNO's PERSPECTIVE, they hated Babi farming. They should sokong and encourage the pendatang to eat more pork, lard filled char kuay teow, char siew rice so all will be erased by JE. Then they can have a 99% UMNO country. (1% of Pendatang also don't eat Babi)
However, However, whats left are a population that walks around with serious flu infection that crow every now and then, some have their foot in their mouth, many mad ones moooing in the street and even on TV during News broadcast......

YES, Dr Rafick, I agreed that with the new integrated farming (with stringent enforcement), the farm will be cLEANER than our public toilet. BUt current Pig farms are just tooo repelling to visit. SAD.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by Tompios, April 15, 2008 06:09:17
Not all Christians eating pork. Seventh-day Adventist church is more likely Abrahamic religion and far clean than Islam. They are really following the rules of clean and unclean food in the Bible. As far as I know, this Adventist trying to avoid meat as a diet.

Lev 11:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses and to Aaron, saying unto them,
Lev 11:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth.
Lev 11:3 Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, and cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat.
Lev 11:4 Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the hoof: as the camel, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
Lev 11:5 And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
L